<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SuperAff.com &#187; SEO Chatter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superaff.com/archives/category/seo-chatter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superaff.com</link>
	<description>Resources and hype-free conversation for webentrepreneurs interested in making money online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Googlebot Kickin</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/11/07/googlebot-kickin/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/11/07/googlebot-kickin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/11/07/googlebot-kickin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This landed in my inbox, thought it was interesting &#8211; Googlebot Just Got The Boot: Having been defamed by Google, along with many other bloggers, gave me an opportunity to reevaluate my relationship with big G. I have decided to see how will this blog survive on its own- without Google. So I have instructed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/11/07/googlebot-kickin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Google Spanking Earthquake</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/11/a-google-spanking-earthquake/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/11/a-google-spanking-earthquake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/11/a-google-spanking-earthquake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you imagine for a moment the earthquake that would result around the web and Wall Street if, in an organized and concerted effort: a) Webmasters removed adsense ads from their websites for one week b) Webmasters stopped paying for adwords for one week c) Everyone stopped clicking adsense for one week Reading things like: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/11/a-google-spanking-earthquake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Doing Something &#8211; And I Love It!</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/09/googles-doing-something-and-i-love-it/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/09/googles-doing-something-and-i-love-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/09/googles-doing-something-and-i-love-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing something moving and fluxing in Google&#8217;s SERPs right now (past two days), and it&#8217;s so rocking my world. I don&#8217;t know if this is permanent, but past experience tells me that things will kick butt for a few days then settle back down. I can&#8217;t help but wish it would stay like this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/10/09/googles-doing-something-and-i-love-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contextual Links Via V7N</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/contextual-links-via-v7n/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/contextual-links-via-v7n/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/contextual-links-via-v7n/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another thing I&#8217;ve caught up with (haven&#8217;t done much reading lately), John Scott has launched a new service for bloggers to make money (see Contextual Links) and he has (once again) stirred up chatter. One thing John Scott does very, very well is stir up &#038; create chatter . Kudos to him! Although it isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/contextual-links-via-v7n/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Blog Post Matt Cutts Style</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;ve been noticing more and more bloggers lately aren&#8217;t linking to the actual source of information they&#8217;re discussing. I was reading a post over at Matt Cutts&#8217; blog regarding the new paid link service John Scott is offering (more on that later), and it struck me as odd that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In 2007 Domain Authority Is Almost Everything</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/22/in-2007-domain-authority-is-almost-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/22/in-2007-domain-authority-is-almost-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/22/in-2007-domain-authority-is-almost-everything/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stole the title from Peter Da Vanzo&#8217;s post The Google Minus 30 Penalty But if I had to summarise all the SEO data I’ve seen, and the discussions I’ve had with people over the past year, it is this: In 2007, domain authority is almost everything. Great content on untrusted domains goes nowhere. Peter&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/22/in-2007-domain-authority-is-almost-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal Name Reputation &amp; Authority &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/11/29/personal-name-reputation-authority-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/11/29/personal-name-reputation-authority-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2006/11/29/personal-name-reputation-authority-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over two months ago I had a tinfoil hat Creepy-Google moment, there&#8217;s news now filtering out about that&#8211;updates in the comment section: Personal Name Reputation &#038; Authority.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/11/29/personal-name-reputation-authority-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False Online Storefronts?</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/10/18/false-online-storefronts/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/10/18/false-online-storefronts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dirty Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2006/10/18/false-online-storefronts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a few web directories that are getting stinkier and stinkier to work with over time. Ninety percent of the submissions are the usual MFA, Amazon knock-off, auto-gen mass reprint article content, and every type of splog imaginable. And so on. But the site quality for submissions is getting WORSE as time goes on. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/10/18/false-online-storefronts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal Name Reputation &amp; Authority</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/11/personal-name-reputation-authority/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/11/personal-name-reputation-authority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/11/personal-name-reputation-authority/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not afraid of tinfoil hats. Sometimes I go there. Here&#8217;s a thought, something to chew on. I&#8217;ve been reading Graywolf&#8217;s post Does Google use Whois Information and he&#8217;s got some great ideas to vary up your whois data. I don&#8217;t want to start some crazy discussion about web mafia tactics, dark gangstah arts and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/11/personal-name-reputation-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is SEO For Affiliate Product Sites Dead?</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/05/is-seo-for-affiliate-product-sites-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/05/is-seo-for-affiliate-product-sites-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aff Chatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Chatter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/05/is-seo-for-affiliate-product-sites-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First I&#8217;ll say I have a smidgen of affiliate sites still doing ok in both Yahoo! and MSN (for the time being). Never have I done well in Google. With the latest Yahoo! update knocking out some of the power keyphrases I used to rank well in, I&#8217;ve been doing some investigating. Going through some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://superaff.com/archives/2006/09/05/is-seo-for-affiliate-product-sites-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

