<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Blog Post Matt Cutts Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/</link>
	<description>Resources and hype-free conversation for webentrepreneurs interested in making money online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liara Covert</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/comment-page-1/#comment-31082</link>
		<dc:creator>Liara Covert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/#comment-31082</guid>
		<description>SEOs aren&#039;t all they&#039;re cracked up to be.  Companies will pay huge amounts of money to supposedly integrate strategies which will boost their search engine rankings. Yet, companies that don&#039;t outsource for SEO specialists can also do quite well on their own.  I agree with Dave Cole who reminds us good and bad info exist. It&#039;s our responsibility as bloggers to raise awareness of what tools are worth using and why and which ones would be better to avoid. Reading up on options is very wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOs aren&#8217;t all they&#8217;re cracked up to be.  Companies will pay huge amounts of money to supposedly integrate strategies which will boost their search engine rankings. Yet, companies that don&#8217;t outsource for SEO specialists can also do quite well on their own.  I agree with Dave Cole who reminds us good and bad info exist. It&#8217;s our responsibility as bloggers to raise awareness of what tools are worth using and why and which ones would be better to avoid. Reading up on options is very wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cole</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/comment-page-1/#comment-28788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2007/01/25/a-blog-post-matt-cutts-style/#comment-28788</guid>
		<description>I think it all spawns from the fact that everyone is obsessed with links as the be-all-end-all of search engine performance. Every forum &amp; blog revolving around SEO or organic optimization has at some point tried to explain how you should only have &quot;good&quot; inbound links or you should never link to a poor ranking site, etc. Too much bad information out there. If something is worth referencing, reference it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it all spawns from the fact that everyone is obsessed with links as the be-all-end-all of search engine performance. Every forum &amp; blog revolving around SEO or organic optimization has at some point tried to explain how you should only have &#8220;good&#8221; inbound links or you should never link to a poor ranking site, etc. Too much bad information out there. If something is worth referencing, reference it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
