<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch Out &#8211; Canonical URL Bloopers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/</link>
	<description>Resources and hype-free conversation for webentrepreneurs interested in making money online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Dani wp seems to handle it fine. No errors showing up in the stats, plus I&#039;ve been pulling the blog feed with carp (showing on the directory). Everything&#039;s running smooth.

I also double checked with Google, Yahoo and MSN and the pages they&#039;ve spidered - no errrors with those pages:

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Afabaroo.com%2Farticles%2F&amp;meta=

Thanks for that head&#039;s up, something to definitely watch for with other blog software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dani wp seems to handle it fine. No errors showing up in the stats, plus I&#8217;ve been pulling the blog feed with carp (showing on the directory). Everything&#8217;s running smooth.</p>
<p>I also double checked with Google, Yahoo and MSN and the pages they&#8217;ve spidered &#8211; no errrors with those pages:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Afabaroo.com%2Farticles%2F&amp;meta=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Afabaroo.com%2Farticles%2F&amp;meta=</a></p>
<p>Thanks for that head&#8217;s up, something to definitely watch for with other blog software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Beware, there&#039;s some software out there that won&#039;t allow you to fix this problam.  Or at least, in combination.

I have a directory script in a subfolder that uses virtual directories.  In the main folder is a blog.  With my current blogging software, it won&#039;t do the WWW redirect without breaking its other rewrite rules that create the virtual directories.  I THINK when I had WordPress, this wasn&#039;t true, but I&#039;m not sure.  I think late one night, I&#039;ll have to install WordPress over what I already have (backing up my current setup) and see if it works.  If so, I may have to go back to it.

At this point, I&#039;m not sure whether it&#039;s the blog&#039;s rewrite rules that are funky or the directory.

Next time, I&#039;ll test my setups better before I commit to a particular script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware, there&#8217;s some software out there that won&#8217;t allow you to fix this problam.  Or at least, in combination.</p>
<p>I have a directory script in a subfolder that uses virtual directories.  In the main folder is a blog.  With my current blogging software, it won&#8217;t do the WWW redirect without breaking its other rewrite rules that create the virtual directories.  I THINK when I had WordPress, this wasn&#8217;t true, but I&#8217;m not sure.  I think late one night, I&#8217;ll have to install WordPress over what I already have (backing up my current setup) and see if it works.  If so, I may have to go back to it.</p>
<p>At this point, I&#8217;m not sure whether it&#8217;s the blog&#8217;s rewrite rules that are funky or the directory.</p>
<p>Next time, I&#8217;ll test my setups better before I commit to a particular script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Jon I&#039;m not an .htaccess wizard by any means, but this is what I did for fabaroo&#039;s article blog:

&lt;ul&gt;
Options +FollowSymlinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^fabaroo\.com$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://fabaroo&#183;com/articles/$1 [R=permanent,L]&lt;/ul&gt;

Now when I try to access www.fabaroo.com/articles/ , it directs to fabaroo.com/articles/ so I&#039;m thinking it works :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon I&#8217;m not an .htaccess wizard by any means, but this is what I did for fabaroo&#8217;s article blog:</p>
<ul>
Options +FollowSymlinks<br />
RewriteEngine on<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^fabaroo\.com$<br />
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ <a href="http://fabaroo&middot;com/articles/$1" rel="nofollow">http://fabaroo&middot;com/articles/$1</a> [R=permanent,L]</ul>
<p>Now when I try to access <a href="http://www.fabaroo.com/articles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fabaroo.com/articles/</a> , it directs to fabaroo.com/articles/ so I&#8217;m thinking it works <img src='http://superaff.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon M</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>How do you make changes to the code?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you make changes to the code?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpeters</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>mpeters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/10/02/watch-out-canonical-url-bloopers/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this warning. I checked and six of my sites are having problems in the sub folders. Mainly for blogs (all wordpress). I added the code to .htaccess in those folders like you said and its fine now. Only one site I can see was targetted by sites linking to the wrong version so I was lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this warning. I checked and six of my sites are having problems in the sub folders. Mainly for blogs (all wordpress). I added the code to .htaccess in those folders like you said and its fine now. Only one site I can see was targetted by sites linking to the wrong version so I was lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
