<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoogleBowling New SEO Method?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/</link>
	<description>Resources and hype-free conversation for webentrepreneurs interested in making money online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:57:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-10732</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-10732</guid>
		<description>AHhhh ! Days of darkness for googles has arrived.That’s GoogleBowling. Optimizing pages to knock out competitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHhhh ! Days of darkness for googles has arrived.That’s GoogleBowling. Optimizing pages to knock out competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-7391</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-7391</guid>
		<description>ITA Paul, Google appears to be counting things offsite that could easily be monkeyed with by competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITA Paul, Google appears to be counting things offsite that could easily be monkeyed with by competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul williams</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-7378</link>
		<dc:creator>paul williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 04:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-7378</guid>
		<description>Yes the problem with google is that it penalises websites for offsite activity - but how can they judge if this offsite activity is done by the website owner - it could easily be done by a competitor using black hat seo techniques to associate that site with black hat seo - and therefore getting it penalised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the problem with google is that it penalises websites for offsite activity &#8211; but how can they judge if this offsite activity is done by the website owner &#8211; it could easily be done by a competitor using black hat seo techniques to associate that site with black hat seo &#8211; and therefore getting it penalised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReveNews - Adam Viener</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>ReveNews - Adam Viener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Bowling - Your Site Might be Bowled Off Google Next!&lt;/strong&gt;

 Google Bowling is a new term you should be aware of. Google has been trying to crack down on search engine spam for some time. Their latest algorithms can penalize sites for buying &quot;run of site links&quot; (ads /...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Bowling &#8211; Your Site Might be Bowled Off Google Next!</strong></p>
<p> Google Bowling is a new term you should be aware of. Google has been trying to crack down on search engine spam for some time. Their latest algorithms can penalize sites for buying &#8220;run of site links&#8221; (ads /&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>They could be doing that now Michael. It makes sense and it&#039;s logical and does prevent the &#039;innocents&#039; from being sabotaged.

*Let&#039;s Hope*

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could be doing that now Michael. It makes sense and it&#8217;s logical and does prevent the &#8216;innocents&#8217; from being sabotaged.</p>
<p>*Let&#8217;s Hope*</p>
<p> <img src='http://superaff.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pedone</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pedone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t a simple solution for Google be to simply count links that they are suspecting to be &quot;un fair&quot; ie, site wide text links ads etc, and simply count them as &quot;0&quot; in their algo? In other words, instead of taxing a penalty, neutralize them as part of the ranking equation for that particular site.

If they can asses +&#039;s and -&#039;s for links, they certainly can also make links in question â€œneutralâ€?.

This way, innocent sites don&#039;t get deranked and sites that are trying to build artificial link popularity will just waste their money on buying links. Problem solved.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a simple solution for Google be to simply count links that they are suspecting to be &#8220;un fair&#8221; ie, site wide text links ads etc, and simply count them as &#8220;0&#8243; in their algo? In other words, instead of taxing a penalty, neutralize them as part of the ranking equation for that particular site.</p>
<p>If they can asses +&#8217;s and -&#8217;s for links, they certainly can also make links in question â€œneutralâ€?.</p>
<p>This way, innocent sites don&#8217;t get deranked and sites that are trying to build artificial link popularity will just waste their money on buying links. Problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Black Hat GoogleBowling SEO Black Hats for Hire</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Black Hat GoogleBowling SEO Black Hats for Hire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] more. SEO Black Hat GoogleBowling is now a reality. 	The term Google Bowling was coined by Terry on threadwatch and elaborated on by Greywolf in April [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more. SEO Black Hat GoogleBowling is now a reality. 	The term Google Bowling was coined by Terry on threadwatch and elaborated on by Greywolf in April [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloaking, IP delivery, search engine optimization and marketing with fantomNews  Archive   &#187; Birth of a Buzzword: News On GoogleBowling</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloaking, IP delivery, search engine optimization and marketing with fantomNews  Archive   &#187; Birth of a Buzzword: News On GoogleBowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] their hands, idling away their day following nerdy, frivolous search results, here&#8217;s &amp;#85 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their hands, idling away their day following nerdy, frivolous search results, here&#8217;s &amp;#85 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superaff.com/archives/2005/04/19/googlebowling-new-seo-method/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been watching and tracking the term GoogleBowling. Here&#039;s what I have so far:

At Trendmapper:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trendmapper.com/charts/pages/googlebowling-22042005-2176.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Trendmapper&#039;s GoogleBowling Chart&lt;/a&gt; 

What is Trendmapper?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Trendmapper is a tool to generate historical data from search engines.

Trendmapper contains a list of search phrases and will do a daily search for all of them. The amount of hits are recorded, and a chart is made on basis of the data that is collected.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s neat to watch the movement of the term. Also watching technorati:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;url=googlebowling&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technorati&#039;s Results&lt;/a&gt; 

Only has 4 results so far (that surprised me).

Also Google search:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;q=googlebowling&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&#039;s Results&lt;/a&gt; 

Provides 42 results in the SERPs so far, and lots of shuffling around in the rankings.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=googlebowling&amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;toggle=1&amp;ei=UTF-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yahoo&#039;s Results&lt;/a&gt; 

Provides a whopping 138 results. Wow!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?FORM=MSNH&amp;srch_type=0&amp;q=googlebowling&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MSN&#039;s Results&lt;/a&gt; 

With the largest amount of results at 274!

So what&#039;s the big deal about tracking all these results? It&#039;s interesting to watch the timeline of the various engine listings, what pages are listed where and the difference in SERPs between all three engines. It&#039;s a sort of &#039;experiment&#039; I guess, an opportunity to watch a new term work it&#039;s way into the rankings. The term GoogleBowling wasn&#039;t in the SERPs on any engine just one month ago so it&#039;s a great chance to watch and observe how the engines deal with it.

Maybe reveal a secret or two. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been watching and tracking the term GoogleBowling. Here&#8217;s what I have so far:</p>
<p>At Trendmapper:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trendmapper.com/charts/pages/googlebowling-22042005-2176.html" rel="nofollow">Trendmapper&#8217;s GoogleBowling Chart</a> </p>
<p>What is Trendmapper?</p>
<blockquote><p>Trendmapper is a tool to generate historical data from search engines.</p>
<p>Trendmapper contains a list of search phrases and will do a daily search for all of them. The amount of hits are recorded, and a chart is made on basis of the data that is collected.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s neat to watch the movement of the term. Also watching technorati:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;url=googlebowling" rel="nofollow">Technorati&#8217;s Results</a> </p>
<p>Only has 4 results so far (that surprised me).</p>
<p>Also Google search:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;q=googlebowling" rel="nofollow">Google&#8217;s Results</a> </p>
<p>Provides 42 results in the SERPs so far, and lots of shuffling around in the rankings.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=googlebowling&amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;toggle=1&amp;ei=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">Yahoo&#8217;s Results</a> </p>
<p>Provides a whopping 138 results. Wow!</p>
<p><a href="http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?FORM=MSNH&amp;srch_type=0&amp;q=googlebowling" rel="nofollow">MSN&#8217;s Results</a> </p>
<p>With the largest amount of results at 274!</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the big deal about tracking all these results? It&#8217;s interesting to watch the timeline of the various engine listings, what pages are listed where and the difference in SERPs between all three engines. It&#8217;s a sort of &#8216;experiment&#8217; I guess, an opportunity to watch a new term work it&#8217;s way into the rankings. The term GoogleBowling wasn&#8217;t in the SERPs on any engine just one month ago so it&#8217;s a great chance to watch and observe how the engines deal with it.</p>
<p>Maybe reveal a secret or two. <img src='http://superaff.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
